Home / Hospital Negligence / Survivors of Symphysiotomy Criticises Government Proposal

Survivors of Symphysiotomy Criticises Government Proposal

Survivors of Symphysiotomy has made a public statement which claimed that the group will not enter into mediation over compensation while the government still fail to acknowledge that the practice of symphysiotomy was medical negligence.

Marie O´Connor-the chair of the organisation-was speaking at an emergency general meeting in Dublin in response to proposals from Minister for Health James Reilly. The proposal suggested that Survivors of Symphysiotomy should participate in a negotiated mediation to obtain compensation for survivors of the dangerous medical procedure, rather than take action through the courts.

In her address to the group, Ms O´Connor said that the proposed scheme is exploitative and they do not want to be involved in it . She claimed that the government was looking to “ buy their silence” by suggesting that they don’t go through the courts. She claimed that Minister Reilly´s proposals were based on the draft findings of the government-commissioned Walsh Report, in which it was found that the majority of the symphysiotomy procedures that were carried out were “medically acceptable” under the circumstances.

Ms O´Connor argued that members of the group were betrayed by the medical professionals at the time. As the government maintains their position in not considering symphysiotomy a form of medical negligence, the victims are also being denied access to the courts and a “fair and equitable” settlement of compensation for the pain and anguish the women suffered during and after undergoing a symphysiotomy procedure.

The group has requested compensation of between €250,000 and €450,000 for each survivor of the surgery, and has called on the government to move ahead with legislation first accepted in April to remove the Statute of Limitations which time-bars their eligibility to claim compensation for symphysiotomy medical negligence.

In contrast to Survivors of Symphysiotomy’s position, two other survivor support groups – Patient Focus and SOS Ltd – have indicated that they are in favour of Minister Reilly´s proposals. They say that it could be less traumatic and time consuming for the victims, and will allow for them to put this in their past more quickly. However Ms O´Connor stated fervently that she did not want to see a Magdalene-type settlement, in which some survivors were offered as little as €11,500. “Victims will not allow themselves to be re-victimised by being forced to collude with the official line that symphysiotomy was acceptable medical practice,” she said.

About dentalnegligenceie

Check Also

HSE Facing Legal Action in Relation to BreastCheck Misdiagnosis

A BreastCheck misdiagnosis compensation claim against the Health Service Executive (HSE) has been filed by …